Senator CORMANN (Western Australia—Minister for Finance and the Public Service, Vice-President of the Executive Council and Leader of the Government in the Senate) (14:16): Firstly, I would refer Senator Sterle to a previous answer where I pointed out that I'm in this chamber representing Prime Minister Morrison. I'm not in this chamber representing a Prime Minister a couple of prime ministers ago. And the other point I would make is that you are flogging a dead horse. How about focusing on the Australian people? How about focusing on giving the Australian people the best possible opportunity to get ahead? How about focusing on a pro-business, lower taxes, increased growth, more-jobs agenda where more Australians will have the opportunity to get a job, to build a career and to get the best possible— The PRESIDENT: Senator Wong on a point of order. Senator Wong: Again, my point of order goes to direct relevance. I don't know why the minister is so scared of telling the truth, but the one question that has now been asked on five occasions that the minister is refusing to answer is: why was the Prime Minister sacked after a year and a half? The PRESIDENT: That is part of the question that was asked by Senator Sterle. As long as the minister is directly relevant to part of the question, I can't instruct him how to answer the question. I call the minister. Senator CORMANN: Thank you very much, Mr President. If the Labor Party wants to continue to ask me questions about decisions that were made in the period of the Howard government, good luck to them. We're going to continue to focus on the best interests of the Australian people today and into the future. We will continue to make decisions to ensure that Australians today and into the future have the best possible opportunity to get ahead. The PRESIDENT: Senator Sterle, a final supplementary question.