Senator LEYONHJELM (New South Wales) (16:54): Since Senator Di Natale has provided me an opportunity to add to my earlier comments, I'll do so. I note that Senator Di Natale still cannot—notwithstanding the invitation in my earlier address—say what it is that he thinks is so bad about the exchange that occurred in June on the last day of sitting. Which of the four statements was sexist? Which of the four statements was misogynist? Which of the four statements slut-shamed her? Which of the four statements was demeaning and defamatory? If it wasn't what occurred within the chamber, then what are we talking about here? Are we talking about an exchange that occurred outside; comments I made in the media? Is that what we're referring to here? If we are, they are subject to a court action. We shouldn't even be considering those issues. If we are really talking about those four expressions that I referred to in my earlier address, let's think about what else, as Senator Bernardi said, Senator Hanson-Young has engaged in. I actually had the Parliamentary Library investigate how many times Senator Hanson-Young has been required to withdraw comments in this chamber. Senator Cameron: Big deal. That's nothing. Senator LEYONHJELM: I acknowledge the interjection of Senator Cameron. Maybe it doesn't mean much— Senator Cameron: Because nobody cares! Senator LEYONHJELM: I know you would say that, because you've had quite a lot of comments of your own that you've been required to— The PRESIDENT: Senator Leyonhjelm, it is not appropriate to refer to comments that have been withdrawn. I just ask all senators in this debate to recall that. Senator LEYONHJELM: Okay. So 26 times in her time in this Senate Senator Hanson-Young has been required to withdraw comments—and they're only the ones that were heard and were drawn to the attention of the chair. I haven't been asked to withdraw a comment at any time since I've been in here in this Senate. An honourable senator interjecting— Senator LEYONHJELM: Yes; if you don't hear it, you can't very well withdraw it, can you? On the behaviour we are talking about here, first of all, what Senator Di Natale has mentioned is nothing but hyperbole. He won't say what he is talking about that leads to those accusations. Senator Hanson-Young won't say what she thinks she did say—because, clearly, she did say something. If the issue is really all about what was said outside the chamber, why on earth are we talking about it here? The PRESIDENT: Senator Di Natale, given that you stated the purpose of moving that motion, I was going to ask whether you wish to withdraw the suspension of standing orders at this point. Senator Di Natale: I'm happy to withdraw now. The PRESIDENT: Is leave of the chamber granted for Senator Di Natale to withdraw that motion? Leave granted. The PRESIDENT: The question is that motion No. 950 be agreed to.