Senator CASH (Western Australia—Minister for Jobs and Innovation) (14:55): This question has been asked and answered on a number of occasions now, both last year in Senate estimates and in question time and this year in Senate estimates and again in question time. This is all about whether or not moneys provided by the person who wants to be the Prime Minister of this nation— The PRESIDENT: Order! Senator Cash, please resume your seat. Senator Cameron, on a point of order? Senator Cameron: Yes, it's on relevance, Mr President. This is a simple question. It's clear. We're simply asking: have the minister's current or former staff been interviewed by the Australian Federal Police? The minister has not answered it. She is accountable to parliament. She is accountable to this place. She should answer the question. The PRESIDENT: Senator Cameron, I consider the minister to be answering the terms of your question at the beginning in the same terms she was before. I remind the minister of the terms of the question in the material she was just turning to. Senator CASH: As I said, the only question that needs to be answered is: did Mr Shorten make a donation of $25,000 of AWU members' money— The PRESIDENT: Senator Cash, please resume your seat. Senator Wong, on a point of order. Senator Wong: The point of order is direct relevance. There was only one question asked as to whether or not any current or former staff have been interviewed by the AFP. That is the only question that is asked. The PRESIDENT: I remind the minister of the specific nature of the question asked. The minister has concluded her answer. Senator Cameron, on a final supplementary question.