Ms JULIE BISHOP (Curtin—Deputy Leader of the Opposition) (14:48): My question is to the Prime Minister. I remind the Prime Minister of her confession to Slater & Gordon in her exit interview of conduct which appears to be in breach of the WA— Mr Dreyfus: Madam Speaker, I raise a point of order. That is simply argument and is out of order. It should not form part of the question. The SPEAKER: I was going to, at the end of the question, ask the Deputy Leader of the Opposition to rephrase the question. Ms JULIE BISHOP: I remind the Prime Minister of her statement to Slater & Gordon in her exit interview of conduct which appears to be in breach of WA Criminal Code sections 170, 409 and 558, and Associations Incorporation Act section 43. Does the Prime Ministers expect to enjoy the confidence of this House now that the record of her exit interview shows that she misled the WA Corporate Affairs Commissioner into registering a sham association, and has failed to reveal the truth about this matter in her statement to the House. Mr Dreyfus: Madam Speaker, I raise a point of order, which is that this whole question is simply argument. It is not substantiated. It cannot be substantiated. It is an assertion without basis by the Deputy Leader of the Opposition and cannot be properly put. It does not conform with the standing orders. The SPEAKER: The question was full of argument, but so many of them have been this week that it is a bit difficult to rule which ones have been in or out of order.