Senator CASH (Western Australia—Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for the Public Service, Minister for Employment and Minister for Women) (14:42): I thank Senator Cameron for his question. I reiterate the statements that I have already made to the Senate in relation to when I was advised. I was actually briefed by my department in relation to the issue that Senator Cameron raises. In relation to the action that I took, Senator Cameron, I don't know about you, but, on this side of the chamber, the government firmly believes in the rule of law, and unlike those— The PRESIDENT: Order, Minister. Senator Cameron, a point of order? Senator Cameron: Yes, a point of order on relevance, Mr President. I asked how and by whom—how and by whom—was the minister informed, and what action did she take once she was aware of Mr Hadgkiss's behaviour? The PRESIDENT: Thank you, Senator Cameron. Two of the elements, I agree, the minister hasn't addressed yet, but the minister has been directly relevant in answering your question in relation to 'what action'. I think it's unfair for me to rule otherwise, so the minister is in order. Senator CASH: Thank you, Mr President. As I was saying, Senator Cameron, clearly, unlike you, this is a government that firmly believes in the rule of law and, unlike you, we practise what we preach. In other words, Mr Hadgkiss was given, as was due to him, the presumption of innocence. The PRESIDENT: Senator Cameron, a supplementary question?