Senator ABETZ (Tasmania—Leader of the Government in the Senate, Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for the Public Service and Minister for Employment) (14:09): The ISDS to which the senator refers is a provision in free trade agreements that I think have now been part and parcel—and I stand corrected—in about 20-plus arrangements, including ones that the former Labor government negotiated. So this is a classic case of Labor does something, it is perfect; if the coalition does something, by definition it must be wrong. This is the sort of immature and very un-Australian approach that Senator Wong is taking to these free trade agreements. Senator Moore: Mr President, my point of order is on direct relevance. Perfect or not, the question was around the impact of renewable energy targets or carbon farming schemes under the new arrangement. That was the question. Could I ask that the minister be reminded of the question. The PRESIDENT: Again, the question contained two elements. The first element was asking for confirmation. I cannot be across all the technical detail in every answer, but the minister has been answering the question in relation to the question that was asked. If the detail is incorrect in the minister's response, that is not an issue for me to arbitrate. The minister has been directly relevant. The minister has the call. Senator ABETZ: Yet again, the Labor Party are very sensitive to be reminded that these ISDS provisions are common in these agreements—agreements to which the Australian Labor Party themselves signed up the Australian nation. We agreed with that approach. Now that we do it, the Labor Party cannot reciprocate. (Time expired)