Senator WONG (South Australia—Minister for Finance and Deregulation) (14:06): The campaign was not unlawful, and Senator Brandis knows that. Senator Brandis: No, it's just a breach of the law! Senator WONG: He knows that. He just said that in this Senate knowing that was correct. It says something about the honour of the man. Second, I would make this point: if those opposite want to talk about campaign advertising, perhaps they would like to look back to Work Choices. Senator Brandis: Mr President, I raise a point of order. Senator WONG: I know you do not want to talk about it, George. The PRESIDENT: Senator Wong, resume your seat. Senator Brandis. Senator Brandis: Mr President, you have ruled before that abuse of the opposition is not a directly relevant answer to a question about government policy. I ask you to enforce your earlier rulings. Honourable senators interjecting— The PRESIDENT: Order! There is no point of order, but comments should be directed to me in the chair. Senator WONG: Mr President, what precious petals they are today! They do not like to be reminded of the hundreds of millions of dollars they spent telling Australians that reducing workers' wages and conditions was great for them. They do not like to be reminded of spending taxpayers' money to tell parents that it was great for them to have to go into work without notice, that it was great for them to have their wages and conditions reduced. The reality is— Senator Brandis: Mr President, no part of this answer is directly relevant to anything other than the Howard government's Work Choices advertising campaign. There are only six seconds to go. You ought to conclude that the minister has defied your ruling. The PRESIDENT: The minister has six seconds remaining in which to address the question. Minister, I draw your attention to the question. Senator WONG: In relation to the FMA system, as the senator would be aware, Finance sets the procurement guidelines— (Time expired)