Ms GILLARD (Lalor—Prime Minister) (14:34): I refer the House to the answer I gave to these sorts of questions yesterday. I said yesterday that to my knowledge no such briefing was given to the press gallery on the assertions and allegations made by the member who asked the question, I point out that Mr Hodges has left my employ because of what I thought was a grave error of judgment. If the member has very specific other allegations then she should put them. Mrs Bronwyn Bishop: Mr Speaker, on a point of order of direct relevance, I asked specifically about Mr Sam Casey—we know about Mr Hodges—and whether he was also briefing. Mr Albanese: Mr Speaker— The SPEAKER: Order! The Leader of the House will resume his seat because I am listening to the point of order being put forward by the member for Mackellar who has the call. Mrs Bronwyn Bishop: Thank you, Mr Speaker. To repeat it for your hearing, I asked specifically about Mr Sam Casey. We had an answer yesterday about Mr Hodges. I asked specifically: did Mr Sam Casey, of her then media unit, in fact also brief the media? The SPEAKER: I get the gist of what the member is saying. She will resume her seat. On the point of order, I call the Leader of the House. Mr Albanese: When those opposite rise, as they do for every single answer, about a point of relevance, they have to point out the standing order and the point of relevance. That should not be an opportunity to repeat the question or, what usually happens, which is to repeat a changed question. The SPEAKER: The Leader of the House will resume his seat. While it is helpful to the Chair if honourable members taking points of order cite the particular standing order, it is certainly not necessary for that to occur. I take the point of order raised by the member for Mackellar to refer to direct relevance and I ask the Prime Minister to continue her response bearing in mind the substance of the question. Ms GILLARD: My answer, as yesterday, is not to my knowledge.