Senator WONG (South Australia—Minister for Finance and Deregulation) (14:58): My recollection is that we have released I cannot recall how many hundreds of pages. I think there have been a main report of 200 pages, consultant reports totalling more than 300 pages and around 90 spreadsheets providing detailed modelling results. So to suggest that the government has not put forward comprehensive information to enable people to understand the modelling I think would be incorrect. Senator Joyce: I rise on a point of order, Mr President. Once more it is a question of relevance. The question quite clearly says this. When will you release the full details of the effect on regional Australia? When are you going to do it, Minister? Are you going to release the full details on regional Australia, or are you not going to release the full details on regional Australia? It is not a hypothetical question. Give us a date. Senator Ludwig: On the point of order: again all that the opposition have decided to do is take the opportunity of raising a point of order through relevance to restate the question. The minister has been answering the question and the minister can take the opportunity to explain to those opposite the 'why' part of the question. It does not mean that the minister has to answer the question in a response that you particularly want, which is either a yes or no answer. The minister has been answering the question, the minister has been directly relevant to it and the minister is entitled to continue answering that question. It should be ruled that there is no point of order. The PRESIDENT: I believe the minister is answering the question. I cannot instruct the minister how to answer the question, as I have said on previous occasions. The minister does have 32 seconds remaining to address the question. Senator WONG: I again say this government has released an enormous amount of detail associated with the modelling and that shows continued jobs growth, continued growth in incomes, continued growth in output, contrary to the scare campaign of those opposite. If the good senator is really interested in details in this debate—and I have to say he probably is not because I do not think his view will change—he might like to be upfront about just how much more tax the policy he supports will be imposing on Australian households.