Ms PLIBERSEK (Sydney—Minister for the Environment and Water) (14:02): It's a very interesting question coming from a former minister for the environment. Opposition members interjecting— The SPEAKER: Order! We just discussed showing courtesy as the deputy leader was shown. Let's just get through the first question. Ms PLIBERSEK: It's a very interesting question coming from a former minister for the environment who actually commissioned Professor Graeme Samuel to review the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, agreed with his recommendations, tried to get them through the parliament and didn't manage to do it. Having claimed that she would deliver environmental law reform, she didn't. We have in the Senate right now stage 2 of our environmental law reform. Stage 1 passed through this parliament around this time last year; we established the nature repair market and we expanded the water trigger. Stage 2 is in the Senate right now, and if those opposite had any sense, they would vote for it in the Senate. What it does is provide faster, clearer decision-making for business—something that business has been calling for since 2020, when the former minister reviewed— Mr Perrett interjecting— Ms Ley interjecting— The SPEAKER: Order! The Deputy Leader of the Opposition will cease interjecting, and so will the member for Moreton. Mr Dutton: You didn't even vote for it! Ms PLIBERSEK: Mr Speaker, I think the Leader of the Opposition continues to mistake aggro for strength. Stage 2 of our environmental law reform has something for everyone. It's got faster, clearer decisions for business, and it's got much stronger environmental protections. What it does is establish Australia's first environment protection agency. It also establishes Environment Information Australia, which would provide much clearer data about how we're going with the environment and it would also provide information to business about where and how they can develop all of the projects that we know Australia needs—the infrastructure projects, the housing projects and so on. The real mystery here is how those opposite, having commissioned Professor Graeme Samuel to have a really good look at our environmental laws, were not able to accept Professor Samuel's recommendations given to your government when you were the minister.