Mr DUTTON (Dickson—Leader of the Opposition) (14:40): My question is to the Prime Minister. Premier Minns was open and honest with the people of New South Wales when he briefed and provided confidence to the public in declaring what date he'd been advised of the planned terrorist attack by this unknown organisation or people or individuals. The Prime Minister has been embarrassed, because he wasn't advised by the police because they were worried about him leaking the information ahead of any action by the police. Government members interjecting— The SPEAKER: Members on my right! Mr DUTTON: I'm asking my question, Mr Speaker. The SPEAKER: Yes, but reflecting directly on a member, as we discussed late yesterday in question time— Mr DUTTON: It's not a reflection, Mr Speaker; it's a fact. Let the Prime Minister dispute it. I'm stating a fact. The SPEAKER: Whilst we're dealing with this, resume your seat. The Leader of the House has risen on a point of order during a question, but it's an important point that I want to hear. Mr Burke: The reflection that was contained within the question cannot, under standing orders, be part of the question. Either, if the Leader of the Opposition insists on saying it, the whole question should be ruled out of order or he should simply frame the question without the part that's disorderly. Mr Dutton: On the point of order: if the Prime Minister claims to have been misrepresented there are avenues for him at the end of question time to make that point. The statement I've made is a statement of fact, and it's the reason the Prime Minister keeps digging. I'm happy to— The SPEAKER: Just as we dealt yesterday, in the last part of question time, with the Leader of the Opposition taking offence at the reflection that was directed towards him, to assist the House—to assist question time so we don't get bogged down—I'm going to ask the leader to rephrase that part of the question so that we can deal with this and he can have the right to ask his question. Mr DUTTON: I'm happy to assist. My question is to the Prime Minister. Prime Minister, Premier Minns was open, honest and transparent with the people of New South Wales when he declared that on 20 January he was advised by New South Wales police about the planned terrorist attack. The Prime Minister has been asked on multiple occasions to be honest, open and straightforward with the Australian public as to why he wasn't notified. The Prime Minister has previously advised dates on which he's been notified of serious events by the Australian Federal Police. Why can't the Prime Minister just be honest with the Australian people?