Mr HOGAN (Page—Deputy Manager of Opposition Business) (15:04): My question is to the Minister for Indigenous Australians. Does the minister recall making the following statement in July 2019 when speaking about a federal treaty: 'It could be about fiscal arrangements.' Government members interjecting— The SPEAKER: I'm going to ask the member to state that question again because I didn't hear the end part. There was too much noise on my right. Mr HOGAN: The question is to the Minister for Indigenous Australians. Does the minister recall making the following statement in July 2019 when speaking about a federal treaty: 'It could be about fiscal arrangements.' Mr O'Connor interjecting— The SPEAKER: The minister for skills is warned! The Deputy Leader of the Opposition, on a point of order? Ms Ley: Mr Speaker, I seek your ruling. Last week you indicated that, if members interjected and were warned, and subsequently interjected, they should be removed under standing order 94(a). Those standing orders, respectfully, Mr Speaker, do need to be applied equally. The Minister for Home Affairs is in this question time a serial offender, and you have warned her— The SPEAKER: Resume your seat. I thank the deputy leader for raising that matter, because she is correct. When questions have been asked and before the answer of the minister or the Prime Minister or where the question is directed is not the time to interject. I've made that crystal clear. The Minister for Home Affairs was warned. The person at fault this time was the minister for skills, and I warned him. I can give the deputy leader an assurance. If the Minister for Home Affairs interjects one more time, she will leave—as will the minister for skills.