Mr WOLAHAN (Menzies) (14:31): My question is to the Minister for Indigenous Australians. Yesterday the minister told this House that subsection (iii) of the Voice constitutional amendment means parliament will determine the functions and the powers of the Voice. Isn't it the case that subsection (iii) explicitly deprives parliament of that power to make laws, where those laws conflict with the Voice's powers under subsection (ii), and interpreting the scope of those would be a matter for the High Court, not this parliament? Mr Hogan interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Page will cease interjecting. The Leader of the House on a point of order? Mr Burke: I am not sure if it is possible to have a question that is more directly seeking a legal opinion than the one that was just asked. The standing orders have very few prohibitions but that is one of them. The SPEAKER: I will hear from the Manager of Opposition Business on a point of order. Mr Fletcher: This is a question that goes to matters that the minister put to the House yesterday, so it's perfectly standard to ask the minister to explain what she was saying in her answer yesterday. The SPEAKER: The part of the question regarding a legal opinion, obviously, is not in the standing orders. The question regarding the minister's answer yesterday is in order, so she is able to refer to that part of the question, and I give her the call.