Mr PORTER (Pearce—Attorney-General, Minister for Industrial Relations and Leader of the House) (14:53): Again, the premise of the question is completely incorrect. The idea, the proposition and the assertion that we have had question after question and that there is anything in what has been proposed that would result in the type of reduction that the Leader of the Opposition suggests, is completely wrong. The protections that exist in the act presently, that Labor inserted, are precisely, word for word, the protections that we have suggested should remain in the legislation that is now before the parliament. Dr Aly interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Cowan is warned. Mr PORTER: When you go to the relevant provisions, the protections that would absolutely and in all circumstances prevent happening what the Leader of the Opposition wrongfully says would happen are these: you can never have the approval of agreement unless, 'The approval of the agreement would not be contrary to the public interest.' That is the protective line inserted by Labor, and here they are replicated in the reforms before the parliament. These are the exact same words: the approval of the agreement would not be contrary to the public interest. This is desperate, absolutely desperate. Tell untruths, try and scare people—the signs of absolute desperation. If Yoda were here, he would remind us that fear of leadership tensions leads to the dark side. Leadership fear leads to anger. Anger leads to wildly untrue assertions in question time. That is the path to the dark side of politics, and that's the path that this Leader of the Opposition is on.