Mr ABBOTT (Warringah—Leader of the Opposition) (14:07): I have a supplementary question to the Prime Minister. Given that almost everything the Prime Minister has just referred to has actually been the work of the member for Griffith when he was in the top job, has the political assassination of a prime minister been worth it? Mr Albanese: Mr Speaker, on a point of order: that was not a supplementary question. It should be ruled out of order Mr Abbott: Mr Speaker, on the point of order: she did in her answer almost entirely refer to the work of her predecessor. I admire the work of her predecessor and that is why it is entirely in order to ask her this question. The SPEAKER: Order! I simply say to the Leader of the House I was more concerned about the application of standing order 100 to the question rather than whether it was a supplementary question or not. I can only say that—through generations of speakership—leaders of the opposition, as has been given to prime ministers, have been given leeway but that leeway and the way in which in this case the standing orders that apply to the rules for the questions are put in place should not be expected on all occasions. But I allow the question on this occasion.