Mr ALBANESE (Grayndler—Leader of the Opposition) (15:36): My question is addressed to the acting minister for immigration. It goes to his last answer, where he ignored the $165,000 donation from a private company which seeks to 'build and operate the visa system'. I ask the minister: if it looks like a privatisation and it smells like a privatisation, why won't the minister concede that this is privatisation of our visa system by a major donor and mate of the Prime Minister? Mr Porter: Mr Speaker, the acting immigration minister answered at great length the part of the question which was in order, which was with respect to whether or not the visa system is or is planned to be privatised. Clearly, it's not. That part of the question that went to a donation is a party political matter not within the auspices of the minister's portfolio. The SPEAKER: I say to the Leader of the House that, in reference to political donations, the minister's not responsible for those. Indeed the Prime Minister's not responsible for those; they're matters that parties are responsible for. So I agree with the Leader of the House. The part that is in order is the question relating to the visa system and the question of privatisation and that's in order for two reasons: in substance and because the Leader of the Opposition is referring to the minister's last answer. The minister can answer the question and confine himself to that part of the question.