Mr BURKE (Watson—Manager of Opposition Business) (15:04): My question is to the member for Hughes under standing order 99. I refer to the member's motion on the Notice Paper which relates to the National Energy Guarantee and says that it provides certainty for investors and reduces price volatility. Under standing orders, this motion will be removed from the Notice Paper if it's not selected for debate again. When will the motion be debated again, and has the member sought any intervention to have it debated? The SPEAKER: The Leader of the House on a point of order. Mr Albanese: Thinking time won't help him! The SPEAKER: The member for Grayndler! I warn you on irony first. Mr Pyne: The member for Hughes does not have responsibility for what the Selection Committee decides, and therefore he's not capable of answering that question. Mr Burke: Mr Speaker, to the point of order: I refer to your previous ruling on exactly this matter. The SPEAKER: I thank the Manager of Opposition Business. That previous ruling said that certainly the member who has a motion on the Notice Paper can be asked a question. It's well written up in Practice. But the only part that is in order is the matters that go to procedure and timing. I think almost word for word I could say, just as I said last time, that the member doesn't control the Selection Committee. It doesn't prevent him being asked the question.