Mr DREYFUS (Isaacs—Deputy Manager of Opposition Business) (14:32): My question is to the Prime Minister. Does the Prime Minister stand by his statements on secret payments and should government policy be extended to him? Can the Prime Minister confirm that he was party to a secret payment to settle litigation which alleged he personally breached corporations law in the collapse of AIH—a devastating collapse which saw thousands of Australians left with worthless insurance policies? Is this another example, just like penalty rates, where the Prime Minister believes— Honourable members interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Isaacs will resume his seat. Mr Pyne interjecting— The SPEAKER: The Leader of the House will cease interjecting. Mr Sukkar interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Deakin is warned. I am going to need to hear the question again to judge whether it is in order. Mr DREYFUS: My question is to the Prime Minister. Does the Prime Minister stand by his statements on secret payments and should government policy be extended to him? Can the Prime Minister confirm that he was party to a secret payment— Mr Fletcher: Too gutless to go outside the parliament, aren't you! The SPEAKER: The Minister for Urban Infrastructure will leave under 94(a). The member for Bradfield then left the chamber. The SPEAKER: The member for Isaacs will ask his question again. Just before you do, I will make it very clear: I am not going to keep repeating myself. All interjections are disorderly, but, when I have made it clear to the House that I am seeking to hear the question again because I have been prevented due to interjections, anyone who interjects is in very grave danger. Mr DREYFUS: My question is to the Prime Minister. Does the Prime Minister stand by his statements on secret payments and should government policy be extended to him? Can the Prime Minister confirm that he was party to a secret payment to settle litigation which alleged he personally breached corporations law in the collapse of AIH—a devastating collapse which saw thousands of Australians left with worthless insurance policies? Is this another example, just like penalty rates, where the Prime Minister believes it is one rule for him and his big business friends and another for workers? The SPEAKER: Having had the opportunity to now listen to the question, I say to the member for Isaacs that a large part of that question relates to a time prior to the Prime Minister assuming office and, indeed, prior to him becoming a member of parliament. Opposition members interjecting— The SPEAKER: If members want to interject on me, I will just move on and we will not have the question at all. The rules for questions and answers are very different, and members know that—particularly former ministers who are now shadow ministers. Only the first part of that question is in order.