Mr BURKE (Watson—Manager of Opposition Business) (14:36): In question time a few moments ago, the Prime Minister said that he supported the penalty rates decision. He also said, 'We support the independent umpire whether it is the courts or— Honourable members interjecting— The SPEAKER: The Manager of Opposition Business will resume his seat for a second. Members on both sides will cease interjecting. As I have said many times, they expect me to hear the question. If they want me to rule on it— Mr Fitzgibbon interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Hunter! Perhaps he is sitting close to the door for a reason. I want to hear the Manager of Opposition Business in silence. The Manager of Opposition Business will begin his question again. Mr BURKE: My question is to the Prime Minister. In question time a few moments ago, the Prime Minister said that he supported the penalty rates decision, and he also said: 'We support the independent umpire, whether it is the courts or whether it is the Fair Work Commission.' Given that this parliament regularly changes the law following decisions of the courts or tribunals when they were not what the government wanted, including when the government abolished the Road Safety Remuneration Tribunal, and noting that legislation doing exactly that on native title is before the Senate now, is the reason the Prime Minister refuses to act in this instance simply because he supports the pay cut? Mr Fletcher interjecting— The SPEAKER: The Minister for Urban Infrastructure will cease interjecting.