Mr MORRISON (Cook—Treasurer) (14:26): I thank the member for his question. Once again, I can confirm the package of measures that we took forward to the last election and we took forward in this year's budget, which was designed to make sure that our superannuation system was fairer and more flexible, recognising changing working patterns and the things people work for over the course of their lives so that it can reflect their circumstances—for example, if you are a contractor or running a home based business, you are not denied your access to superannuation concessions—which those opposite opposed. Several weeks ago those opposite said they opposed the measure in the budget, in our superannuation package, which was designed to ensure people running home based businesses—those working for small businesses who could not access salary deductions for superannuation contributions—could access those concessions. They said they would not allow and support those measures. Our package of measures is designed to deliver all of these things, to deliver that $3 billion in net savings to the budget and to ensure that we are making the system flexible and fairer. And we are committed to those measures achieving that goal. We are absolutely committed to those measures achieving that goal. There is no doubt about what members on this side of the House are committed to. We are committed to fairer, more flexible superannuation that achieves the goal of making sure it is sustainable, and we are committed to ensuring jobs and growth in our economy. But particularly on the issue of growth I want to raise this. The member opposite has asked this question and I think it goes, really, to what he stands for. I notice his statement today, which says, 'Economic growth is only worthwhile if …' 'If'! In what circumstances do you come into this House and say that economic growth is only there if you are interested in it in particular circumstances? What he is saying is that support for economic growth on that side of the House is conditional. Mr Bowen: Read it all! Mr MORRISON: You have said it is conditional. 'Economic growth is only worthwhile if'—if, if, if. Well, there are no qualifications on economic growth on this side of the House. We know, on this side of the House, that this economy has to fight for every inch of growth it can get, because only by growth can you get the jobs— (Extension of time granted) I thank the member for that opportunity, because the statement is entitled 'Referring to the achievements'—achievements, Mr Speaker! Let me list some of the achievements of those opposite over the last 12 months. No. 1, they lost the election because they did not have an economic plan. No. 2, they took a budget black hole to the last election and said you need to increase the deficit by $16½ billion. Their other achievement was to backflip on $47 billion of spending promises they made that they backflipped on at the last election. Whether it was on foreign aid or the schoolkids bonus or pension assets tests or whatever it was, it was $47 billion worth of backflips. The other thing they have backed is the lazy Susan of Australian politics, Senator Dastyari. That is what they have backed. That is one of their achievements. They voted against multinational tax legislation. Opposition members interjecting— The SPEAKER: The Treasurer will resume his seat for a second. The level of interjection is far too high. I have already asked a number of people to cease interjecting and warned a couple. I am now adding the member for Lindsay to that list. Mr MORRISON: In addition to opposing our laws to get multinationals to pay their fair share of tax—that was one of their other achievements—they tried to smash the property market with their proposal to attack hardworking Australians just trying to get ahead by investing in a rental property. In addition to that, they sought to block critical infrastructure such as WestConnex in Sydney and Freight Link in Perth. Of course, the great achievement they were following on from was their seeking to scuttle the East West Link, where the taxpayers of Victoria had to pay more than $1 billion for the privilege of not building a road. Opposition members interjecting— The SPEAKER: The Treasurer will resume his seat. The member for McMahon can resume his seat for a second. The member for Grayndler can cease interjecting. We will just take a moment out. I asked the member for Lindsay to cease interjecting and she began to interject continuously. I have warned the member for Lindsay. She is a new member. I am warning her again. It will be the last time. Mr Albanese interjecting— The SPEAKER: Interjections on me are highly disorderly. I warn the member for Grayndler. Mr Bowen: Mr Speaker, I seek leave to table the press release, which reads, 'Economic growth is only worthwhile if it keeps people in good, well-paying jobs.' The SPEAKER: The member for McMahon can resume his seat. An opposition member interjecting— The SPEAKER: No. He did not listen to my previous ruling.