Mr PORTER (Pearce—Minister for Social Services) (15:04): I thank the member for Herbert for his question. As he is aware, yesterday the Prime Minister and the Queensland Premier signed the agreement which will be the transitional bilateral for Queensland. Ninety-one thousand participants in Queensland now have complete certainty about the rollout of the NDIS in Queensland. What that means is that NDIS bilaterals have been signed with South Australia, Tasmania, New South Wales, Victoria and the ACT. This means that 85 per cent of the 460,000 Australians with a disability who are expected to be eligible have complete certainty as we move forward to the full rollout of the NDIS in 2019. At full-scheme rollout, the bill for the NDIS will be $22 billion a year. Yesterday in this place the government introduced the National Disability Insurance Scheme Savings Fund Special Account Bill, which will create a special account to make up for the fact that, most unfortunately, the member for Lilley did not leave enough secure and identifiable money for the scheme. Now, you may know the answer, Mr Speaker— The SPEAKER: I say to the minister: I am not here to answer questions. Mr PORTER: to this multiple-choice question. Which of the following is true: (a) the member for Lilley delivered four surpluses in one night; (b) the member for Lilley raised $11 billion from the mining tax in two years; (c) the member for Lilley provided a secure, identifiable source of funds to fully provide for the $11.3 billion NDIS; (d) the member for Lilley was named world's best Treasurer? In an excruciating twist of irony, the only one of those four that it is true is the final one. The member for Lilley claims that a missing $5 billion actually exists. The Commonwealth government will be committed to $11.3 billion worth of funding to the NDIS. Of that, $1.1 billion comes from existing Commonwealth funding, $3.3 billion from the Medicare levy and $1.9 billion from existing specialist disability services. That leaves a gap of $5 billion. We have created an account into which we will place identified— Mr Swan interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Lilley will cease interjecting and using unparliamentary terms. Mr PORTER: savings to the tune of $5 billion over the next period of three years, to 2019. If members opposite do not believe that this is required, will they seriously vote against a bill that creates a special account for where savings can be identified and secured to pay for the NDIS? That will be the test of their mettle on this. Will they support a bill that funds the NDIS? Mr Bowen interjecting— Mr Nikolic interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for McMahon will resume his seat. The member for Bass will resume his seat. Mr Pyne: Mr Speaker, I rise on a point of order. Given your admonition earlier about taking my points of order from the dispatch box rather than my seat— The SPEAKER: It is the only place you can take them, I say to the Leader of the House! Mr Pyne: I have approached the dispatch box. I would ask that you ask the member for Lilley to withdraw the unparliamentary statements he was making during the minister's answer. He knows they are unparliamentary. I ask that he withdraw them. The SPEAKER: The Leader of the House will resume his seat. This is not a criticism of the Leader of the House, but I was about to do that at the conclusion of the answer rather than interrupt the answer. I say to the member for Lilley that he knows the words he was using are unparliamentary. I ask him to withdraw. Mr Swan: I will not withdraw. It is a lie. The SPEAKER: I say to the member for Lilley, it is— Mr Hunt interjecting— The SPEAKER: The Minister for the Environment will not interject. I have asked the member for Lilley to withdraw. All members who have used those words have been asked to withdraw. Mr Swan: I will not withdraw. It is a lie. The SPEAKER: I name the member for Lilley!