Mr ROBB ( Goldstein — Minister for Trade and Investment ) ( 14:44 ): I thank the member for his question. He has valiantly opposed trade at every step for as long as I can remember. That is your entitlement, but as a spokesman for the Labor Party in question time—it tells us all something. Ms Macklin interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Jagajaga! Mr ROBB: Secondly, a piece of legislation is not difficult to draft. I agree with that. But it does create certain— Mr Champion interjecting— Mr ROBB: Listen to me and I will tell you. It does create complications. You are like a university student, the way you carry on. The SPEAKER: The member for Wakefield will leave under 94(a). The member for Wakefield then left the chamber. Mr ROBB: Goose! Dr Chalmers interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Rankin is warned. Mr Conroy: Mr Speaker, a point of order under standing order 90: the minister made an unparliamentary remark regarding the member for Wakefield. I ask him to withdraw. The SPEAKER: The minister will withdraw. Mr ROBB: I withdraw. The SPEAKER: The minister will continue. Mr ROBB: It does cause complexities and complications, and the reason is that if we move legislation which makes all sorts of demands about making it mandatory in the Migration Act— Mr Burke interjecting— Mr ROBB: Do you want to know the facts about the act, or not? You have asked me not one question about the facts, yet you will not listen to me when I get up here. It creates a complication because we are going to do things to China that we have not done to any other country. That is the problem. And all of a sudden it underscores the xenophobic, racist activities on your side of the House. It underscores in one question— The SPEAKER: The Minister for Trade— Mr ROBB: That is the first question you have asked me, and it is about the racist— The SPEAKER: The Minister for Trade and Investment well knows that he cannot reflect on members opposite. He can reflect on a union campaign or a document. He must withdraw. Mr ROBB: I will withdraw, if it was taken as personal. Opposition members interjecting— Mr ROBB: I withdraw. Regarding the request that Labor is making, there is not a cigarette paper of difference between the worker protections in this China deal and all the other deals that we have done, including those under Labor. There is not a cigarette paper of difference between them. There is no substance to your arguments. You have tried for weeks now, and no-one—forget about us, but no-one outside—has confirmed the arguments and the cases that you are putting, because when they go into the depth of it they find that the regulations and the requirements are identical. Secondly, if we start to put a bill down, you have a list of requirements as long as your arm. That is the other complication. And it will be all be directed to China and no-one else. (Time expired)