Mr ABBOTT (Warringah—Prime Minister) (14:42): While the government is interested in jobs and growth, all members opposite are interested in doing is smearing a former High Court judge. Frankly, for someone who rejoices in the title 'QC' to be engaged in this grubby exercise is beyond contempt. It really is beyond contempt. Ms Macklin interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Jagajaga has been warned. Mr ABBOTT: I have been asked about comments today. Mr Matheson interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Macarthur is warned. Mr ABBOTT: Let me give the QC opposite who asked the question a statement from Mr Duncan McConnel, President of the Law Council of Australia. He said: The public attacks on the Commissioner being played out through the media are unacceptable and damage the basis on which tribunals and courts operate … Mr Watts interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Gellibrand is warned. Mr ABBOTT: The President of the Law Council went on: The person who sits as a Royal Commissioner is entitled to the same respect, inside and outside of the inquiry, as a judge in a court. In this case, Mr John Dyson Heydon AC QC is a highly regarded former judicial officer. The proper way for dealing with any question of bias, including apprehended bias, is to make an application for the Commissioner to recuse himself … Why does the QC opposite not know that? Why does the QC opposite not respect that? Frankly, the QC opposite has demeaned himself— Mr Sukkar interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Deakin is warned. Mr ABBOTT: he has demeaned this parliament and he has demeaned his leader by asking that question.