Mr JOYCE (New England—Minister for Agriculture and Deputy Leader of The Nationals) (14:54): I thank the honourable member for his question. Quite obviously, when the question was being answered—amongst the barrage of noise—we went and found the information. And that information actually does not come from my department; it comes from the Department of Human Services. When we had that information, it was precisely as we delivered in the actual answer to your question, and we put that precisely on the record—that is, as before: there were 4,957 applications; 4,098 were granted; 453 were rejected; and 4,011 are receiving payment. Opposition members interjecting—So you changed the Hansard! The SPEAKER: The member for Isaacs will desist. The SPEAKER: The Manager of Opposition Business on a point of order? Mr Burke: Madam Speaker, I refer you to page 621 of House of Representatives Practice which states, with respect to Hansard: … emendations which alter the sense of words used in debate or introduce new matter are not admissible … In terms of forms of the House— The SPEAKER: This is not relevant to question time. There are other forms of the House you may use. Mr Burke: what path do you advise us to pursue, given that there has been a clear breach of practice? The SPEAKER: The Manager of Opposition Business will resume his seat. The Leader of the House? Mr Pyne: Madam Speaker, questions to do with the management of Hansard are quite properly put to you at the end of question time, not used as a debating point during question time. I suggest that, if the Manager of Opposition Business has such a question, he should put it to you at the appropriate time. The SPEAKER: I would simply say to the Manager of Opposition Business that, if he wishes to make a serious allegation, he knows perfectly well what the forms of the House are. I call the honourable the member for Corangamite.