Senator WONG (South Australia—Minister for Foreign Affairs and Leader of the Government in the Senate) (14:41): I'm asked a question by Senator Bragg, or Braggy, as his colleagues call him—I quite like that—about the lack of expenditure from a fund that they wanted to abolish, that they held up and that, during the election, they refused to allow expenditure from. Just so I get that clear, Senator Bragg, you're asking for expenditure from a fund that you wanted to abolish, that you opposed and held up and that, during the election campaign— Honourable senators interjecting— The PRESIDENT: Order! Senator Cash interjecting— Senator McGrath interjecting— The PRESIDENT: I've asked for order. Senator Cash and Senator McGrath, order! Senator McGrath: Why won't you answer the question? The PRESIDENT: Senator McGrath, come to order! Senator WONG: I again repeat it, because it really bears some repeating, doesn't it? The coalition is asking us why there hasn't been more spent from a fund that they opposed and wanted to abolish. Their election costings abolish it. I'm not surprised you're embarrassed. The PRESIDENT: Senator Bragg? Senator Bragg: On relevance, the question was about the financial outgoings of this scheme. The PRESIDENT: That's right. You asked about the scheme, and the minister is entitled to respond to your question, and the minister is being relevant. Senator WONG: But it is interesting, President, that they complain about the money out of the scheme being less than it should be when they actually wanted all of it abolished, they held it up and they, during the election campaign, refused to agree to 5,000 houses being commenced out of the HAFF. That's your policy. (Time expired) The PRESIDENT: Senator Bragg, second supplementary?