Senator WONG (South Australia—Minister for Foreign Affairs and Leader of the Government in the Senate) (14:14): I think this question was asked the day before yesterday. An opposition senator: No, it was yesterday. Senator WONG: Was that yesterday? The days blur together, I'm sorry. And a number of points were made, I think, by Senator McAllister in response to this. The first is, obviously, that these decisions are made in accordance with the law by the minister for the environment. It is the case that the minister did make a determination in relation not to the mine itself but to one of the locations for the tailings and waste dam. Obviously, it's open to the company to consider an alternative site, and the advice I have is that more than four sites were investigated, with a number of options in the mix. I would also make the point, Senator Duniam, that back in 2021 the relevant minister then, which was the deputy Liberal leader, Sussan Ley, made a similar decision just down the road from the goldmine and also considered the views of the same traditional owner group— Senator Duniam: For a go-kart track. Senator WONG: and protected the site under section 10 of the protection act. The interjections, I think, are not on point, Senator Duniam. The point is that there's a legal framework, and ministers have a responsibility to— Honourable senators interjecting— The PRESIDENT: Order! Order across the chamber. Minister, please continue. Senator WONG: You make me laugh. You do. It was you. Senator Duniam: I do. My jokes are the best! Senator WONG: I think Senator Watt might dispute that, actually! But, anyway, we'll leave that for another time. What I would say is that there is a statutory responsibility that the person occupying the role, the minister, has to exercise, and that's what minister— (Time expired) The PRESIDENT: Senator Duniam, first supplementary?