Senator PAYNE (New South Wales—Minister for Foreign Affairs and Minister for Women) (14:29): Creativity and ingenuity in the opposition have decreased to such an extent that they are unable to provide a second supplementary question to senators, other than one that repeats the previous supplementary question! Notwithstanding that enormous challenge that those opposite are facing, let me say— The PRESIDENT: Senator Polley, on a point of order? Senator Polley: Yet again the minister is not being relevant. She is not being relevant to the question that I put to her. The PRESIDENT: Senator Polley, I've made this point before. The question contained a number of loaded political phrases. The minister was, I would imagine, making a glancing observation and is entitled to some very wide latitude to address the terms, assertions and imputations in the question. Senator Payne, I call you to continue with the question. Senator PAYNE: Thanks very much, Mr President, because, of course, I was specifically addressing the wording of Senator Polley's question and specifically pointing out to Senator Polley that what we have identified this week in the chamber is a number of programs with very specific tourism focus which are separate from JobKeeper, which are separate from the political questions they are asking in that context and which are about protecting and maintaining jobs in tourism. The PRESIDENT: Order! I have Senator Wong on a point of order. Senator Wong: The point of order is relevance The question goes to priorities and why you're cutting JobKeeper and cutting wages but spending money on advertising and a private plane— The PRESIDENT: Senator Wong, I heard Senator Payne say that she had concluded her answer. Indeed, Senator Payne has concluded her answer.