Senator GALLAGHER (Australian Capital Territory—Manager of Opposition Business in the Senate) (15:53): I ask that parts 1 and 2 of this motion be put separately. The PRESIDENT: Okay. So I will put clause (a)(i) and (ii) separately to the remainder of the motion—is that correct? It's clauses (i) and (ii) of paragraph (a) so paragraph (a) stays there to cover the rest of the clauses if they're treated differently? An honourable senator interjecting— The PRESIDENT: Because the Senate could still note clauses (iii), (iv) and (v) without actually noting (i) and (ii). Senator GALLAGHER: Sorry, it's (a) and (b). It's not (i) and (ii); it's (a) and (b). We want to vote separately on those two. The PRESIDENT: Alright; that makes it easier. In the question now paragraph (a) and paragraph (b) are being treated separately—essentially, the matter of the royal commission being treated separately to the substantive matters. Senator Hanson-Young interjecting— The PRESIDENT: I'm just trying to assist the Senate, Senator Hanson-Young. Senator Roberts?