Senator COLBECK (Tasmania—Minister for Aged Care and Senior Australians and Minister for Youth and Sport) (14:04): Senator, I completely reject the premise of your question, because what you're trying to do in this circumstance— Senator Watt interjecting— Senator COLBECK: Actually, you belled the cat yourself last night. Senator Watt interjecting— The PRESIDENT: Order, Senator Watt! Senator Cormann, on a point of order? Senator Cormann: Interjections are always disorderly. The level of interjection is completely and utterly unacceptable. A question is asked and it's immediately followed by a barrage of interjection, preventing the minister from answering the question. Clearly, the senator's not interested in the answer; he's just interested in political points. The PRESIDENT: Senator Wong? Senator Wong: On the point of order: whilst Senator Watt is doing his best, he's certainly nowhere near Senator Doug Cameron on the barrage yet. I think Senator Cormann is demonstrating his sensitivity over a minister who's struggling. The PRESIDENT: I'm not sure if, with all due respect to our former colleague, that's the best example. Interjections are always disorderly. I had just called the senator to order. I call Senator Colbeck to continue his answer. Senator COLBECK: The thing that concerns me about where Labor and Senator Watt are trying to go with this issue right now is that they're trying to make it about something that it wasn't. They're trying to go to something about what it wasn't. They're trying to suggest that people knew in advance what might happen at Earle Haven—those terrible circumstances that happened at Earle Haven on 11 July. But Senator Watt belled the cat himself last night in his adjournment speech when he said: … the paramedics, people from Gold Coast Health and every single person who got involved in this emergency effort. (Time expired)