Senator CORMANN (Western Australia—Minister for Finance and the Public Service, Vice-President of the Executive Council and Leader of the Government in the Senate) (14:16): I don't accept the premise of the question. Prime Minister Morrison is an outstanding—well, as the chair at the time of Tourism Australia, the highly regarded Tim Fischer said at the time— The PRESIDENT: Senator Wong on a point of order. Senator Wong: The point of order is on direct relevance. The question is: how much money did the Prime Minister receive? How many payouts has he received to go quietly after mismanaging organisations? We're talking about public money. It is a legitimate question. I ask the minister to return to the question. The PRESIDENT: I view the minister as being directly relevant to the part of the question that made assertions. You reminded the minister of part of the question, Senator Wong. I call on him to continue. Senator CORMANN: I don't accept the premise of the question. Mr Morrison was an outstanding performer when it came to promoting Australia's tourism industry and he's highly regarded for his record. Of course, one of his great supporters was the highly popular, the highly regarded then shadow tourism minister, Senator Cameron's friend, Martin Ferguson. We know that Martin Ferguson was singing Scott Morrison's praises for his performance as Managing Director of Tourism Australia up and down Australia. I've tabled a letter, a comprehensive letter, pointing out the outstanding track record of Mr Morrison as Managing Director of Tourism Australia. Honourable senators interjecting— The PRESIDENT: Order! We're taking up time normally utilised and valued by the opposition with these conversations.