Senator CASH (Western Australia—Minister for Small and Family Business, Skills and Vocational Education) (14:20): Senator McKim, I completely reject the premise of your question. Those of us on this side of the chamber are very proud of the work that our Department of Home Affairs does in keeping our borders secure. Again, though, Senator McKim does need to be reminded of exactly why— The PRESIDENT: Senator McKim, on a point of order? Senator McKim: Yes, thank you, Mr President. The point of order is on the basis of relevance. I understand that the minister has said the words that she rejects the premise of the question. I do understand that. The issue, though, Mr President, is that I have directly put to the minister that the information she just gave to the parliament in her previous answer is inaccurate. I use the word 'lie' in relation to what the Department of Home Affairs has said. It's the same as the minister has said. So could you please direct the minister to answer the question and to be clear about whether her rejection of the premise is actually a rejection of that assertion. The PRESIDENT: Senators know I cannot direct a minister how to answer a question, as long as they are being directly relevant to the subject matter of the question. The minister is being directly relevant. Senator CASH: Again, then, for the record, I am advised that there has been no impact on the continuity of care for transferees and refugees on Nauru and that another senior medical officer remains on the island. I will also reiterate for the record that I'm advised that there are 65 health professionals contracted by the Australian government to provide health services on Nauru, including 33 mental health professionals. Again, these services are available seven days a weeks and after hours. Again, Senator McKim, this equates to a ratio of one medical professional for every 11 transferees on the island. The PRESIDENT: Senator McKim, a final supplementary question.