Mr LEESER (Berowra) (15:12): Mr Speaker, I wish to make a personal explanation. The SPEAKER: Do you claim to have been misrepresented? Mr LEESER: Most grievously so. The SPEAKER: You may proceed. Mr LEESER: In question time, the Prime Minister quoted some words I said in the second reading debate on the temporary exclusion orders bill in 2019. What the Prime Minister didn't mention was that I was directly explaining how temporary exclusion orders would allow returns to be managed and why they should only be used in our security interests. The government refuses to issue temporary exclusion orders under its self-managed return policy. The government refuses to do exactly the thing that I said the government should do when I addressed the House in 2019. To imply my position is supportive of the government's current approach, as the Prime Minister has done, is misleading and disingenuous. The SPEAKER: Just before we get to the member for Goldstein, when people are doing a misrepresentation, you simply state where the misrepresentation has occurred, not an explanation around it. Short and sharp is the order of business when it comes to misrepresentation, so I hope the member for Goldstein has picked up that cue.