Mr GILES (Scullin—Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs) (14:05): I thank the shadow minister for the question. I remind him, too, that the release of detainees was required by the decision of the High Court in November. It was required. In response to that, we took a range of steps to ensure the Australian community was kept safe, including immediately setting up Operation AEGIS. We saw the coordination of the ABF, the AFP, and state and territory law enforcement authorities. We've put in place stringent visa conditions, and we moved to change the law to criminalise breaches of those visa conditions as part of the four layers of protection we now have in place: stringent visa conditions, electronic monitoring and curfews, community safety orders— The SPEAKER: Order! The minister will pause. The minister was talking about the conditions and about the question. I'm going to listen to the member for Wannon. Mr Tehan: I only want to advise that those conditions— The SPEAKER: Resume your seat. The member for Wannon, as is common in this House, is a serial offender when it comes to coming to the dispatch box and just speaking. He's been here for a very long time. This is the last time— Mr McCormack interjecting— The SPEAKER: Fourteen years, I'm advised by the member for Riverina. Honourable members interjecting— The SPEAKER: Order! Everyone's helping today! I'm going to remind the member for Wannon: this is the last time. You simply can't get to the dispatch box and start speaking. You will get the call, just state the point of order. Silence is going to continue so I can hear the minister. Mr GILES: As I was saying, we've put in place four layers of protection. We've also set up the Community Protection Board to advise government on the appropriate measures to manage this cohort that we were required to release into the community. We've also done something that the former government did not do, and that is that we've made a real investment in immigration compliance—a quarter of billion dollars. This is in sharp contrast to decisions taken by the Leader of the Opposition, who halved the compliance function.