Mr GILES (Scullin—Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs) (14:38): Thank you, shadow minister, for your question. Immediately after the decision, we sought advice on its implications. In the days— Opposition members interjecting— The SPEAKER: Order! The minister will pause. The question has been asked in silence; I want to hear the answer in silence as well. I give the call to the minister. Mr GILES: We sought advice on its implications, and that advice contemplated the work that was done in advance of the decision in contemplation of it. I've spoken on at least three occasions, as has the Minister for Home Affairs, about some of the practical steps we sought to have in place in the event of an adverse judgement. We also sought advice prior to the hearing on the options that would be available, depending on the various outcomes of the decision. I remind the shadow minister—and, indeed, all members—that we're yet to receive the reasons for the High Court decision. However, as I said yesterday morning, and as my statement together with the Minister for Home Affairs said earlier today, we have always been looking at all regulatory and legislative options which are available. The SPEAKER: The minister will pause. Member for Wannon, this had better be on relevance or another point of order. Mr Tehan: Mr Speaker, the question was, 'When'— The SPEAKER: No, no. Mr Tehan: No, relevance. Relevance. The question was— The SPEAKER: You're supposed to say, 'I'm rising on a point of order. It's on—'. Had the minister concluded his answer? He's concluded his answer. I just remind the member for Wannon: if you get the call, always state what the point of order is. Don't just start saying what you feel.