Mr DREYFUS (Isaacs—Attorney-General and Cabinet Secretary) (14:32): I thank the member for Fremantle for his question. Mr Speaker, 14 October will be a very significant moment in our country's history. It will be an opportunity to finally recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in the Australian Constitution. It is important that Australians make a decision based on the facts. Mr Pike interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Bowman is warned. Mr DREYFUS: But the 'no' campaign strategy has been to ignore the facts and instead to sow fear and division across our great country. Don't take my word for it. We know that these are the directions the official 'no' campaign is giving to its volunteers: ignore the facts, and say anything to distract from the actual issue on the ballot paper. An opposition leader with an ounce of decency would distance himself from a strategy based on disinformation and deceit. He would call it out. Mr Thompson interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Herbert is warned. Mr DREYFUS: Not this opposition leader. No claim is too outlandish, no claim is too sinister, no claim is too absurd for this opposition leader. He'll say anything, he'll do anything, to spread confusion and divide our country. The SPEAKER: Order! The Attorney-General will pause. Mr Bowen interjecting— The SPEAKER: The Minister for Climate Change and Energy is not helping. The Manager of Opposition Business on a point of order? Mr Fletcher: Speaker, as you and all members would be fully aware, standing order 90 says that all imputations of improper motives to a member shall be considered highly disorderly. The Attorney-General has just spent the first part of his answer imputing improper motives to the Leader of the Opposition. He is in breach of the standing orders, and he should be drawn back to that. The SPEAKER: I'll hear from the Leader of the House. Mr Burke: Just to the point of order: there is a difference between imputing motives and describing conduct. The Attorney-General's been describing the conduct of the Leader of the Opposition. The SPEAKER: The Manager of Opposition Business on the point of order? Mr Fletcher: Even by the standards of the Leader of the House, that is an unusually nonsensical proposition. The SPEAKER: I'm going to remind the Attorney-General to be mindful of standing order 90 about not imputing motives in his answer. He's entitled to give his view, but he should just make sure he is within the standing orders. Mr DREYFUS: Thank you, Mr Speaker. Let's talk about some facts. The proposed constitutional amendment says that the Voice will have the power to make representations on matters relating to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. That is a fact. The Leader of the Opposition ignores this fact and asserts that the Voice would influence every area of public administration and grind the whole of government to a halt. This is wrong, and the Leader of the Opposition must know that it is wrong. The proposed constitutional amendment says that the parliament will have power to determine the powers of the Voice. That is a fact. The Leader of the Opposition ignores this fact and asserts that the High Court would determine its powers, not the parliament. This is wrong, and the Leader of the Opposition must know that this is wrong. Mr Sukkar interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Deakin is now warned. Mr DREYFUS: I am confident that Australians will see through the opposition leader's tactics. Australians want outcomes, not arguments. Australians want the truth and not grubby tactics. The referendum on 14 October is about three things: recognising Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders in our Constitution, listening to them and, by listening, achieving better outcomes.