Mr DUTTON (Dickson—Leader of the Opposition) (15:21): I seek leave to make a personal explanation. The SPEAKER: Do you claim to have been misrepresented? Mr DUTTON: Most definitely, I do. The SPEAK ER: You may proceed. Mr DUTTON: During question time today, the Attorney-General launched what, in my judgement, is an unprecedented, completely unfounded attack, and on a topic which— Mr Watts interjecting— The SPEAKER: Order! The member for Gellibrand will remain silent while the Leader of the Opposition is on his feet. Mr DUTTON: It was on a topic, Mr Speaker, of the highest sensitivity. If there was some foundation to his claim, if there was some shred of truth or credibility to what he had said, then I would be happy to take the criticism, but it is the complete opposite of what I believe in and of what I have practised my entire life. I have been to many Holocaust museums, and I find it one of the most emotionally difficult issues to deal with, when you read through the history and see the consequences, even today, on people of Jewish faith. That somebody of the Attorney-General's standing would seek to use this issue to his political advantage, I think, reflects very poorly on him. I bring that to your attention because I find it the most egregious breach that I have seen, frankly, of the standing orders and the standards of decency in this parliament. Honourable members interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Lalor and the member for Moreton will cease interjecting and are both warned. Mr Tehan interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Wannon has not indicated to me that he is seeking the call for a personal explanation. Mr Tehan interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Wannon has been here long enough to know that that is not the process that occurs. But, out of respect for him, I will give him the call.