Mr FLETCHER (Bradfield—Minister for Communications, Urban Infrastructure, Cities and the Arts) (14:15): I thank the shadow minister for her question. As she would well know, there is a well-established convention, for very good reasons of public policy, that cabinet ministers do not comment on or disclose what occurred in cabinet. I recognise it has been quite a long time, for very good reasons, since anybody on the other side of this House was in cabinet, because the Australian people have not seen fit to trust them with the heavy responsibility of government. It is quite curious to be on the receiving end of lectures about probity and public policy from the member for Ballarat, of whom it was said in ANAO report No. 9 of 2014-15, 'the recording of reasons for funding decisions did not adequately explain'— The SPEAKER: The minister will resume his seat. The Manager of Opposition Business on a point of order. Mr Burke: Mr Speaker, this is the sort of part that might be in order had there been— The SPEAKER: What is the point of order? Mr Burke: It's on direct relevance—had the question referred to any alternative policies. As it happens, opposition questions rarely involve that. But if alternative policies is what allows these sorts of comments, it is clearly beyond the question that was asked. The SPEAKER: The Manager of Opposition Business will resume his seat. There was no reference in the question to alternative policies. The minister will turn to the question. Mr FLETCHER: You are right, Mr Speaker, but there was a clear suggestion about probity. Let's be clear, the shadow minister's track record when she was a minister in relation to probity was quite properly called into question by the Auditor-General. The SPEAKER: Has the minister completed his answer? Mr FLETCHER: I have.