The SPEAKER (14:01): The Prime Minister will pause for a second. From memory, there may have been a weekend since our last question time, but my attitude has not abated. I need to be able to hear the questions and the answers. When those interjecting wildly do so, it makes it difficult for me to do that. I'm not going to allow that to occur. Members will not interject or they'll be ejected. The Prime Minister has the call. Mr MORRISON: I share the view of the Chair of the Science and Industry Technical Advisory Group, Professor Brendan Murphy. I share his view. The question for those opposite is: why do they call into question the advice provided to the government? The SPEAKER: The Prime Minister will resume his seat. Mr Tehan interjecting— The SPEAKER: The Minister for Education will cease interjecting. The Manager of Opposition Business on a point of order. Mr Burke: On direct relevance: the question asked the Prime Minister whether he'll take responsibility for his own words. You can't just flick past that and say, 'Reframe the question. Oh, Labor is wanting to criticise someone else.' He is the one who said it. The question asked him whether he would take responsibility for it. The SPEAKER: The Prime Minister, in answering the question, has been very relevant up until this point. I call the Prime Minister. Mr MORRISON: Well, thank you, Mr Speaker. I do stand by my words and my words were based on the expert advice of the Chair of the Science and Industry Technical Advisory Group, Professor Brendan Murphy. But he wasn't alone. Queensland Health is also quoted on 3 March 2021 as saying that this is 'not a race'. That was from Queensland Health on their own Twitter feed. So it was the medical advice using that terminology at that time. I listened to the medical advice. Those opposite may want to call into question the advice provided by our medical experts such as Professor Murphy, but I certainly will not. Those opposite cannot run away from the imputation they have put into this place, right here and now, calling into question the judgement of Professor Murphy.