Mr FRYDENBERG (Kooyong—Treasurer) (14:15): The reality is JobKeeper is a remarkable program. They're not my words; they're the words of the Governor of the Reserve Bank. Today it's supporting more than 3½ million Australian workers and around one million Australian businesses. It was established based on being a temporary program, a targeted program, a scalable program and one that could flex depending on the demand. It's the expectation from Treasury— Dr Chalmers interjecting— The SPEAKER: I hope the member for Rankin heard what I said before. Just to make it clear: he has been warned about interjecting more than anyone else in this chamber. Mr FRYDENBERG: I haven't had a question from the member for Rankin since June. The SPEAKER: Just answer the question. An opposition member: [by video link] You haven't answered one for 12 months! Mr FRYDENBERG: The reality is he's not interested in this issue. We have 3½ million Australians who are receiving JobKeeper. The program has been costed at $101 billion and the program is tapering over time. Even the member for Rankin himself has said we should be looking at a kind of tapering. Mr Albanese interjecting— Mr FRYDENBERG: The member for Grayndler interjects. This is what the member for Grayndler said on the Today show about JobKeeper: … there will need to be some form of tapering off. Karl Stefanovic asked the question of the member for Grayndler: What does that look like? The member for Grayndler replied: What it will look like is going down over a period of time … That is the reality of what is occurring with the expansion and the extension of JobKeeper. Originally legislated for six months, it's now going for an additional six months. At $1,500 currently, it goes to $1,200 in the December quarter and it goes down to $1,000 in the March quarter. The reality is this program is supporting millions of Australian workers right around the country. It's a remarkable program. It continues to do a remarkable job and it helps to keep Australians in work. The SPEAKER: Just before I call the member for Indi, I say to those members who are remoting in today for question time—I see none on the government side; I see them on the opposition side—that obviously interjections remotely are equally disorderly. It's hard to identify who they are from, although one member looks particularly guilty. I just will say: the standing orders apply and, if it persists, not only will I enforce the standing orders but you might find yourself disconnected.