Mr HUNT (Flinders—Minister for Health and Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for the Public Service and Cabinet) (15:18): Mr Speaker, I'd like to make a statement on indulgence. I can add— The SPEAKER: No, it's not an indulgence. You can seek to make a personal explanation if you think you've been misrepresented. Mr HUNT: Mr Speaker, I wish to make a personal explanation. The SPEAKER: Do you claim to have been misrepresented? Mr HUNT: I do, indeed. The SPEAKER: You may proceed. Mr HUNT: That's given that I made no reference to any group or any individual. An honourable member interjecting— Mr HUNT: Eli Lilly, absolutely! And I do believe that the company has not behaved ethically—that the company, which is a $137 billion company, is seeking to avoid and overturn the decisions of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. But in relation to the group which was mentioned: there has been no reference to any group or to any individual. And, for clarity, let me make this clear: there is no reference, there has been no reference and nor do I believe that that group has done anything wrong. There you go.