Mr HASTIE (Canning) (13:34): There have been many words this week about the government's plan to trial random drug testing for jobseekers receiving Newstart or youth allowance. Today I rise to speak for my home of Mandurah, which is one of the three sites across Australia where the trial will be conducted. This bill was first introduced in the previous parliament, and so this plan is not new to my community. I can report to the House with confidence that Mandurah is in favour of the trial. Even an online poll conducted in 2017 by our local newspaper, the Mandurah Mail, reported that 70 per cent of people were in favour of the trial. Many of my constituents are employed in mining, construction and other industries where drug testing on the job is normal. Our local police are regularly drug tested. Even employees of the City of Mandurah are drug tested. Indeed, in my former career with the Australian Defence Force, I and other servicepeople underwent random drug tests, even while on operations overseas. So my community wants to know: if it's good enough for workers, why isn't it good enough for jobseekers? If someone can't pass a drug test as a jobseeker, how can they be expected to pass a drug test on the job? I know Senator Lambie has argued that members of parliament should be drug tested. I understand her sentiment. In fact, last year my whole office in Mandurah, in an effort to lead by example, underwent a drug test. I'll have more to say in my speech in the second reading debate, but for now I urge the crossbench in both Houses to listen to the people of Mandurah and vote for this bill.