Mr PASIN (Barker) (11:10): This is a story about free beer tomorrow. That's how the Labor Party went about their Gonski proposal. They took a very serious funding issue and said, 'Look, we'll fund it over six years.' For those listening, you would know that the forward estimates occur over four years. The Labor Party significantly back-ended the funding into years 5 and 6. In terms of this place, years 5 and 6 don't exist. You fund programs, whether it's school based or any other sphere of responsibility, over six years. So effectively what the Labor Party was saying, in terms of Gonski school funding, is 'You'll get your free beer tomorrow.' That's the years 5 and 6. Now they come into this place—make no mistake, this motion is about the South Australian state election that's upcoming, and the Labor Party wanting to find a wedge between themselves and the threat that is the so-called SA-BEST party—and they try to find a point of difference between them. But, quite frankly, this is the wrong way to start, and it's the wrong position. It's more of the kind of 'Mediscare'-type tactics that we saw in the last federal election. Why do I say that? I say that because we have adopted the Gonski plan and we're funding it not with free beer tomorrow but with needs based funding that increases every year across the program. No school in my electorate is worse off, nor should they be, given that there's an additional $1 billion being delivered into the program over the 10 years going forward. I thought I'd deal with individual schools or classes of schools. I don't know if that's been done. If you talk about public schools in my electorate, they're seeing an increase of 24.3 per cent over the years 2018-21. If you take Keith—that might have been the type of school the member for Scullin was talking about earlier—they've gone from $3,021 in 2018 to $3,755 in 2021. That's a 24.3 per cent increase. Obviously there are great differences among schools across my electorate. We've also got a significant penetration of Lutheran schools in my electorate. They're enjoying increases of 16.7 per cent. Catholic schools: 12.8 per cent increase. Independent schools: 29.2 per cent increase. That's why I and other members of this place received a letter from Gregg Smith, the principal of Rivergum Christian College in my electorate, beseeching those opposite during this debate to vote for our proposal. This is about what is best for all schools across all sectors in the long-term. So don't take it from those opposite what's best for school sectors. Take it from people within the sector—someone who, with respect, lives this fight daily. Those listening shouldn't fall for this. I'm looking forward to Mr Zappia, or the member for Makin, coming into this place— The DEPUTY SPEAKER ( Mr Rob Mitchell ): Member for Barker, this will be the last time. That's twice. Refer to members by their correct titles. Mr PASIN: I'm looking forward to the member for Makin coming in, Mr Deputy Speaker. You can seek to interrupt me if you wish, but I want to see motions on the following topics— The DEPUTY SPEAKER: You can sit down if you keep going. Mr PASIN: Transforming health. Let's see South Australian members come in here to talk about transforming health. Let's see them come in here to talk about the recent blackouts in South Australia or—something that members might not be aware of—the fact that a whole wing of the new Royal Adelaide Hospital fell into blackout last week. Let's come in here to talk about children in state care. Let's have a motion about Chloe Valentine and how the South Australian state Labor government failed her and hundreds like her—let's have a motion on that. Let's talk about Oakden and how we failed some of the most vulnerable older people in our state—deathly silence. Let's come in and talk about the Gillman land deal, which a justice of the Supreme Court of South Australia regarded as 'highly unusual'. You won't hear any of that, Mr Deputy Speaker. Let's hear a bit of it. (Time expired) The DEPUTY SPEAKER: The debate is adjourned and the resumption of the debate will be made an order of the day for the next day of sitting.