Mr TURNBULL (Wentworth—Prime Minister) (14:23): One may well ask why the member for Sydney is incapable of drafting a question. The honourable member's question is based on a premise that the government have doubts about the Deputy Prime Minister's eligibility to sit in the House—and we don't. We are satisfied that he is eligible to sit in the House, so the question is based on a false premise. One may well ask: Where is the interest from the opposition in energy prices? Where is the interest in the cashless welfare card? Where is the interest in the fact that it was the Labor Party in government through its complacency—confessed to by the member for Port Adelaide, and we do acknowledge he did finally fess up—with reckless disregard for the interests of the people they claim to represent who allowed gas prices to go through the roof— Ms Plibersek interjecting— The SPEAKER: The Prime Minister will resume his seat. Has the Prime Minister concluded his answer? Mr Turnbull: I have. The SPEAKER: The Prime Minister's concluded his answer. The Manager of Opposition Business on a point of order. Government members interjecting— The SPEAKER: The Treasurer and the Leader of the House will cease interjecting. Mr Burke: There's been a ruling you've previously made concerning preambles, but we're consistently getting a situation now where the preamble is the entire answer and there is no moment of the response that fits the relevance rule. The SPEAKER: I think if the Manager of Opposition Business reviewed that answer he would find that the beginning of it was very relevant to the question and on the— Honourable members interjecting— The SPEAKER: If members on either side interject while I'm addressing the House on a point of order, they'll pay a very severe penalty. The Manager of Opposition Business will find, if he reviews the answer, that the beginning of the Prime Minister's answer was very relevant to the subject answer. The Prime Minister did there compare and contrast—I know the member for Sydney rose to take a point of order—but it's entirely up to the Prime Minister and ministers how long they wish to use of their three minutes. There is no point of order that can force them to give a shorter answer or a longer answer.