Mr WALLACE (Fisher) (16:22): It's with great joy that I take the opportunity to rise today on this motion, because it gives us the opportunity to paint a picture between white and black, between right and wrong, and between what we stand for and what the opposition stand for. Of course, those opposite are all leaving now! If you look at what this side of the House stands for and what we've been able to deliver in the short time that we've been in government, you'll see that what we stand for is honesty and integrity in government. We have restored the Australian Building and Construction Commission after that lot on the other side of the House decimated it when they were in government. We passed the new Australian Building Code. We passed the registered organisations bill and the corrupting benefits bill. Of course, when we talk about industrial relations, they head for the doors! Mr Ted O'Brien: Run, run! Mr WALLACE: Run away, run away—that's right! They know that they have absolutely not a shred of respectability when it comes to industrial relations. It's very sad, because what it's doing is costing our country billions of dollars a year because of the corruption that goes on between the Labor Party and the union movement. Not all unions are corrupt—I accept that—and not all union members are corrupt. What we are against on this side of the House is corrupt unions. What have they given on the other side? What do they stand for on the other side? They stand for secret deals between unions and employers. They stand for corrupt benefits. They voted against our legislation on corrupting benefits. They give away penalty rates. They stand here and they, with the greatest amount of sanctimony, talk to us about— The DEPUTY SPEAKER: Order! The member for Fisher will resume his seat. I call the member for Fenner. Dr Leigh: Deputy Speaker, I'm always reluctant to intervene in the MPI, but when the member alleges that members on this side of the House stand for corruption, I would ask that you ask him to withdraw. The DEPUTY SPEAKER: I was listening to the debate. I believe that there is no point of order. Mr WALLACE: The other side, with great sanctimony, talk about penalty rates. But it was in fact Bill Shorten, when he was the head of the AWU, who sold his workers out—the most disenfranchised, the most lowly paid workers. He sold them out; he threw them under a bus. And for what? So that his own AWU could get secret commissions from those same employers they did dodgy deals with. And it turns out there are all sorts of grubby, dodgy deals being done between the AWU and GetUp!, and in fact the Leader of the Opposition, who's seen, as it turns out, payments being made to his election campaigns. To add salt to the wound, they then set out to try to discredit one of Australia's greatest jurists and undermine the Heydon royal commission—very, very sad, particularly when you look at the number of legal professionals on the other side of the House, that they would go and do that. But it's not just about industrial relations. The difference between us and them is stark in relation to taxes. On our side of the House we've got an agenda to provide and promote jobs and growth. We've achieved record job numbers. Just today we've found out that there were 240,000 new jobs in the last financial year, the strongest full-time jobs growth in 40 years, with 210,800 jobs added just in the past six months—and I see the other side have gone awfully, awfully quiet! Unemployment dropped down to 5.6 per cent, with jobs growth at two per cent—10 times the rate of growth. The Turnbull government are all about jobs—make no mistake about that—and we are getting on with the job. But it's not just about jobs; it's about security. We are getting on with the things that are important to Australians, whilst the other lot, over on the other side of the House—what are they concentrating on? They're concentrating on doing things like arguing about two seconds. The member for Watson was arguing about two seconds today. The DEPUTY SPEAKER ( Mr Coulton ): The time for the debate has concluded.