Mr TURNBULL (Wentworth—Prime Minister) (14:06): We engage in this chamber in robust, even rowdy, debate, but we all operate—we trust—on the basis that our first loyalty is to Australia. Mr Keogh interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Burt will leave under 94(a). The member for Burt then left the chamber. Mr TURNBULL: What we have seen already in the Labor Party with Senator Dastyari is somebody who sold out the Labor Party's policy on the South China Sea in return for the payment of his legal expenses by a company called Yuhu Group led by Mr Xiangmo Huang, who had close links to China's Communist Party. That was cash for comment—no question about that whatsoever. Senator Dastyari was, for a very short time, dropped from the Labor executive as a result. In the last week we have seen the Australian Labor Party contact a Labour member in the New Zealand parliament and ask him to raise issues about the citizenship of the Deputy Prime Minister— Mr Danby interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Melbourne Ports is warned. Mr TURNBULL: with the purpose and intent of undermining the Commonwealth of Australia's government. So outrageous and improper was that conduct that it has been condemned already by Jacinda Ardern, the Leader of the New Zealand Labour Party. She has condemned it. The question that we have for the Leader of the Opposition in Australia is: does he have the same character as Jacinda Ardern? Is he prepared to name the person who went to New Zealand to get them to ask those questions? Is he prepared to condemn that use of a foreign political party and a foreign parliament to undermine the government of Australia? He could have—very simply, straightforwardly and honestly—asked the Deputy Prime Minister a question. He could have asked him a question. Why didn't he do that? I will tell you why. Mr Champion interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Wakefield will leave under 94(a). Mr TURNBULL: If they asked the Deputy Prime Minister to demonstrate that he was in compliance with section 44, they would have to expose— The SPEAKER: The member for Wakefield will leave under 94(a). The Prime Minister will resume his seat. I've asked the member for Wakefield to leave under 94(a). Mr Champion interjecting— The SPEAKER: That's because you couldn't stop yelling. I am not going to let some members of this House disrupt question time for other members of this House. I need to hear the question and the answer; other members of this House are here on behalf of their electorates to participate in the parliament; and it's certainly not what the public have come to see. The member for Wakefield then left the chamber. Mr TURNBULL: If they had asked the Deputy Prime Minister for details of his citizenship— Mr Watts interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Gellibrand will leave under 94(a). The member for Gellibrand then left the chamber. Mr TURNBULL: they would have then had to provide details of their own eligibility and their own compliance with section 44. We have had assurances that everyone on the Labor side is in compliance, but we have had no evidence. We've had that great barrister, the member for Isaacs, say he is satisfied they are all in compliance. But where are the documents? Let's see them. (Time expired) The SPEAKER: Is the Manager of Opposition Business seeking to table a document? Mr Burke: I seek to table the statement from Peter Dunne MP in New Zealand, who says: This is so much utter nonsense - while Hipkins' questions were inappropriate, they were not the instigator. Australian media inquiries were. Honourable members interjecting— The SPEAKER: Leave is not granted. I will just say to some of those on my left, I thought it was a fairly obvious point that the clock's ticking. It's their question time.