Mr STEPHEN JONES (Whitlam) (14:44): My question is to the Prime Minister. I refer to the Prime Minister's recent visit to the electorate of Gilmore and the member for Gilmore's statement yesterday that it is a gift for our young people that their penalty rates have been cut. On that visit did the Prime Minister and the member tell the people of Gilmore that it was government policy to cut their penalty rates? Why do the Prime Minister and the member for Gilmore support cutting penalty rates of Australians? Mr Pyne: Mr Speaker, the member for Whitlam has tried manfully to make this the Prime Minister's responsibility, but because he visits an electorate— The SPEAKER: The member for Sydney will remove her prop or she will remove herself from the House. Mr Pyne: does not mean he is responsible for the statements of the member. It is not within his responsibility; therefore, the question should be ruled out of order. Opposition members interjecting— The SPEAKER: The Manager of Opposition Business will resume his seat. Members on my left will cease interjecting. I am just going to say to members: we are more than halfway through question time, but a number of members have been ejected already. I can tell you that in this parliament there have been a number of repeat offenders. In fact of the total ejections, almost half are by seven people. I am giving fair warning now. Mr Burke interjecting— The SPEAKER: I do not need to hear from the Manager of Opposition Business— Ms Husar interjecting— The SPEAKER: and I do not need to hear from the member for Lindsay, who is once again warned. She cannot help herself. The Leader of the House makes an entirely valid point about the first part of the question, but the latter part of the question specifically asked whether the Prime Minister told constituents something and that part of the question is in order.