Mr PORTER (Pearce—Minister for Social Services) (14:35): I thank the member for his question. I am certainly very happy to get any particular individual details with respect to the person who is the subject matter of your question. Ms Husar interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Lindsay will cease interjecting. Mr PORTER: It is absolutely the case—indeed, it was a process that was started when you were in government—that the assessibility matrix of levels of disability around the Disability Support Pension changed, and, further, under our side of government, there have been more stringent application processes, including consideration of new applications by a Commonwealth appointed government doctor, and looking at all those people in the system under 35 to ensure that those people in the Disability Support Pension system who have a capacity to work—although that might be a modest or limited capacity—are properly assessed for that. You make the point, based on the information that you have provided here, that this person— Ms Husar interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Lindsay is warned. Mr PORTER: seems to not fit inside those changes, and of course I will have a very good look at that. But I might just add, for the benefit of the House, that the reason that these changes were undertaken—and indeed it was a process, with the nature of the assessments and the disability tables, that was started by members opposite, under your own government—was that on 30 June 2014 the DSP population, which had been growing very steadily at around 7.6 per cent each year, had reached 830,000 individuals. When you take out children and other non-working-age people in the Australian population, that represents a rate of one in 20 working-age Australians being on the disability support pension. That is why more stringent processes were put in place. But I would be very pleased to look at this particular individual case to see where that fits into these processes.