Ms CATHERINE KING (Ballarat) (14:09): My question is to the Prime Minister. I refer to the Prime Minister's previous answer. Is it seriously the position of the government that the Prime Minister's credibility on Medicare was unharmed by the freeze on Medicare rebates, unharmed by cuts to pathology and unharmed by plans to make all Australians, even pensioners, pay more for medicines— Government members interjecting— Ms CATHERINE KING: but could not withstand a text message? The SPEAKER: The member for Ballarat will resume her seat for a second. There were a number of interjections on my right. I heard the member for Corangamite. It prevented me from hearing all of the question. I want to hear the question again from the beginning. Ms CATHERINE KING: My question is to the Prime Minister and I refer to the Prime Minister's previous answer. Is it seriously the contention of the government that the Prime Minister's credibility on Medicare was unharmed by your Medicare freeze, unharmed by your cuts to pathology and unharmed by your plans to make Australians, even pensioners, pay more for medicines but could not withstand a text message? Government members interjecting— The SPEAKER: Before I call the Prime Minister— Ms Catherine King: Mr Speaker— The SPEAKER: The member for Ballarat will resume her seat. Ms Catherine King: I ask that you ask the health minister to withdraw that unparliamentary remark. The SPEAKER: Did the health minister use an unparliamentary term? Ms Ley interjecting— Ms Catherine King: You can't tell the truth about that even. The SPEAKER: When there is a wall of interjections, including now from the member for Ballarat, you will understand that it places the minister for health in the same position as the member for McEwen yesterday, so I will not have any innuendo. The Prime Minister does have the call. The question is just in order. It is mostly preamble, but it is just in order.