Mr BUTLER (Port Adelaide) (14:06): Do I look smarter? Mr Turnbull: The honourable member asked if he looked smarter, and the answer to that is clearly no! Mr BUTLER: My question is to the Prime Minister. Yesterday the Prime Minister told the House that under Tony Abbott's direct action policy 'this government is cutting emissions', but RepuTex modelling released just this month shows that under direct action emissions from Australia's biggest polluters will increase by 20 per cent in the next 15 years. When exactly did the Prime Minister sell out his beliefs on climate change? The SPEAKER: The Minister for the Environment. Opposition members interjecting— Mr Butler interjecting— The SPEAKER: The members on my left will cease interjecting. Resume your seat. There is no point of order. The Prime Minister is quite entitled to refer the question to the minister. Mr Butler: I have asked the Prime Minister when he sold out his beliefs. I am sure the Minister for the Environment has a view about that, but ultimately only the Prime Minister knows the answer to that question. Mr Pyne interjecting— The SPEAKER: The Leader of the House will resume his seat. There are a number of statements and questions in there. It was a long question. You took pretty much the full 30 seconds. Mr Pyne: Mr Speaker, I rise on a point of order. The substance of the question was a question. The line that the shadow minister then used to describe his question, which is the last part of the question, was clearly out of order. If the shadow minister insists that that is the question then he is actually ruling his own question out of order. You had a bad day yesterday. You lost four questions yesterday. You're going to have another bad day today. But, if you want a genuine answer to the substance of the question, the minister is prepared to answer it. The SPEAKER: The Leader of the House will resume his seat. The Minister for the Environment has the call—or I can go to the next question.