Mr ABBOTT (Warringah—Prime Minister) (14:38): Yet again, members opposite are seeking to verbal the royal commissioner. In asking that question, the member made a statement about the royal commissioner's statement, which is simply false. In asking that question, he made a statement which is simply false. For the benefit of the member, who may well have just been handed a question that had been drafted by someone else, let me read from the transcript of Commissioner Dyson Heydon's statement earlier today: The email of the 10th of April— that is to say, 10 April 2014, the original email— did not state and I did not understand from it that the Sir Garfield Address was in any sense a fundraiser for the Liberal Party. Mr Swan interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Lilley will cease interjecting, especially since he keeps making the same interjection over and over again. Mr ABBOTT: This is Dyson Heydon: The email stated that it was organised by a body which I was told was 'one of the lawyer branches of the Liberal Party New South Wales division, which had a focus on … professional engagement … So, it was not a fundraiser at all; it was a Liberal Party event organised by one of the lawyer branches of the Liberal Party New South Wales division— Ms Macklin interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Jagajaga. Mr ABBOTT: which had 'a focus on professional engagement'. Ms Macklin interjecting— The SPEAKER: The member for Jagajaga is warned. Mr ABBOTT: It has never been disputed that this was a Liberal Party event. The claim of members opposite is that the royal commissioner knowingly accepted an invitation to a Liberal Party fundraiser. That is false. That is a false claim, and the member who asked the question—I presume inadvertently—did in fact mislead this House in the terms of the question he asked. Mr Burke: Mr Speaker, a point of order: the Prime Minister quoted from a document; I ask him to table that document. The SPEAKER: The Prime Minister has a document that is marked 'confidential'. I call the member for Bass.